Though most of the factors that Schunk mentioned to be key influences on a child's learning and development are inherently interconnected, the home environment, in my opinion, is the first major factor a child encounters. It is the child's initial environment where he first learns. In other words, the home environment is the first school for emotional learning, as Doley, D. (2018) denoted. In the home environment, children unintentionally learn to feel good or bad about themselves, how to express these feelings, and how others react to their expressions of said feelings.
Explore personal and educational insights and scribblings from an English language teacher. Find thoughts on self-development, education, and child-rearing.
Translate
Thursday, October 22, 2020
Effects of home environment on learning
The Adolescent Brain and Neuroscience
Cerebral cortex
- Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Cerebral Cortex | Education, Society, & the K-12 Learner. (2020). Retrieved 4 October 2020, from https://courses.lumenlearning.com/teachereducationx92x1/chapter/cerebral-cortex/
- Thomas, D. (2020). Don't Let Your Hippocampus Stop You From Being A Successful Investor. Retrieved 4 October 2020, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2018/05/10/dont-let-your-hippocampus-stop-you-from-being-a-successful-investor/#1ba34c532694
- Arizona State University. (2019). More than just memories: A new role for the hippocampus during learning: Study shows how the hippocampus provides information to other brain areas during learning. ScienceDaily. Retrieved October 4, 2020 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/03/190306081704.htm
Learning Domains
Education is the process of imparting knowledge and bringing about desirable changes in the learner's behavior. Classroom instructions and activities are the gate way to the process of education. Accordingly, teachers of all subjects plan the objectives of any particular instruction, aka instructional objectives. In other words, instructional objectives refer to the goals of each instructional session. Leaning and/or teaching outcomes are usually based around instructional objectives.
The classification of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives includes three domains: The cognitive domain which is knowledge related, the affective domain which is feelings related, and the psycho-motor domain which is action related. All three domains are interconnected and interdependent. In other words, every educational activity is supposed to address at least one of these domains. However, for the sake of brevity, will only reflect on some of the preferred instructional activities related to the cognitive domain.
At the lowest level of the cognitive domain, we find the ability to recalling knowledge followed by understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating is at the top level of the classification. Teachers know that they have to come up with instructional activities that address the exploration and stimulation of these domains.
One of the basic questions facing educators has always been “Where do we begin in seeking to improve human thinking?” (Houghton, 2004). Depending on the scope of the new knowledge whether it is factual, conceptual, procedural, or meta-cognitive, I try to utilize the adequate tools for formative assessment of my gr.12 students. In other words, I try to use the right prompts that correspond with both, the type of knowledge and the cognitive process dimension. For example, in order to check the student's ability to recall factual information I would use the prompt "list".However, if I wanted to test his memory of a conceptual knowledge I would use the prompt "describe". Similarly, if I wanted to test students understanding of a procedural knowledge I would use the prompt "predict", as opposed to the prompt "construct" if I wanted to test their meta-cognitive capabilities. I make point of having the activity challenge revolve around answering said prompts. In my experience, using the correct prompt is key to realizing learning and/or instructional objectives.
Refernces
1.
Forehand, M. . (2010) Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Technology, Global Text, Michael Orey. (Chapter 3). Retrieved from https://textbookequity.org/Textbooks/Orey_Emergin_Perspectives_Learning.pdf
Thursday, October 15, 2020
Barriers to Learning That Teachers May Overlook
Based on child development theory, the Association for Curriculum Development and Supervision developed five tenets which underpin every student's rights to be healthy, safe, engaged, supported and challenged Slade, S. & Griffith, D. (2013) . Though educational theories that support a "whole-child" education have been around for years, many education systems concentrate on a tiny sliver rof students cognitive abilities and development. Thus, we see emphasis on transmitting content knowledge that is usually memorized by students and called upon in the same form it was recieved. Subjects like science, math, and arts usually dominate curricula. Understandably, not all teachers take into consideration the emotional and cognitive abilities of their individual students when they start a course. However, a "whole-child" education involves more than acquiring inert knowledge in any of these subjects. A whole-child approach to learning involves the development of students physical and mental health, social and emotional development, cognitive development, identity development, and academic development, as Whole Child Approach to Education, (2018) denoted.
Based on their backgrounds and socioeconomic status, students bring different levels of skills related to attention, perception, and memory to the classroom. According to Data and Statistics About ADHD | CDC, (2016), the estimated number of children ever diagnosed with ADHD, according to a national 2016 parent survey is 6.1 million (9.4%). Many other students have ADHD, or similar disease, but have never been diagnosed. These students are more likely to have issues with behavior, academics, and overall learning. These are also the same students who need differentiation the most.
Many teachers who are bound by heavy curricula and head of department guidelines to prepare students to sit for their finals, may not have the time to pay attention to individual students needs, let alone students with special needs. These educators forget that the classroom is a major developmental context for cognitive development. Even busy teachers can promote this by structuring a cognitively stimulating learning environment that is student centered.
In conclusion, be it an undiagnosed student with special needs, a busy teacher, or otherwise, many students with special needs are not getting the cognitive attention they deserve and the ACDS announced in 2007.
References
1.
Whole Child Approach to Education. (2018). Retrieved 11 October 2020, from https://chanzuckerberg.com/blog/explore-the-whole-child-approach-to-education/
2.
Slade, S. & Griffith, D. (2013). A whole child approach to student success. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy. 21-35. From https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287320346_A_whole_child_approach_to_student_success#:~:text=A%20whole%20child%20approach%20to%20education%20is%20one%20which%20focuses,child%20to%20fulfill%20their%20potential.
3.
Data and Statistics About ADHD | CDC. (2016). Retrieved 11 October 2020, from https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/data.html
443 words